no right to do wrong

The West has a new editor. And a new low standard for editorials.

Today, 22 May for example, states that Israel "was left with no choice" but to fight against Hamas. So far, so good.

Now both Hamas and Israel are being charged with committing war crimes. This upsets the editor. Not that the crimes may have been committed -- but that both groups have been charged.

The West logic is this: hamas is a terrorist group, they should be charged. Yes.

But Israel is a liberal democracy and therefore can respond with whatever atrocities they choose to use.

For the editor, two wrongs have clearly made a right.

Or... sauce for the goose is not allowed near the gander.

Whether it's done by this side or by that -- a war crime is a war crime. It is for the Court to determine. Not the editor of a local opinion paper.

Nick Lethbridge    /    Consulting Dexitroboper
Agamedes Consulting    /   Problems? Solved.
   ===


Nothing in life is to be feared. It is only to be understood