One thing is clear about Kate Emery: she does not own or rent out a house. She sees no problem with laws to force landlords to accept tenants with pets. She wants to give tenants the right to nail pictures to the wall. (Does she see any limit to the allowable "minor" changes?)
In fact, she wants more. Emery suggests that cruel landlords are responsible for homelessness. She seems to be ready for house-owners to be forced to accept homeless people into their houses. What next? Force people to give their second set of clothes to the poor? Why not.
Dr Nick Lethbridge / Consulting Dexitroboper
... Agamedes Consulting / Problems ? Solved
===If you're not a part of the solution, then you're part of the vast majority. (Alfred E. Neuman)
Dying for you to read my blog, at https://notdotdeaddotyet.blogspot.com/ :-)
No comments:
Post a Comment