The letters page of The West, on 29 March 2008, has two views: Earth Hour is a ridiculous idea because it's just one hour -- and we will waste other resources while the power is off; and it's a great idea because every little bit helps. Hmmm...
Thinking Lateral |
---|
Need new thinking for your own problems? email nick leth at gmail dot com |
Yes, it is a ridiculous idea. What help will it be to save one hour of power? Especially if we burn barbecue wood instead. After the bbq we will all stay up an extra hour -- with the plasma tv switched on -- as we watch the shows that we recorded during earth hour.
And it's crazy logic which says that we should ignore earth hour. After all, every little bit helps. But the really crazy logic is this: it is all over after one hour.
It's like "clean up Australia day"... We're all disappointed when that one day collects less rubbish than the year before. Why? Presumably, we're disappointed because "other" people have thrown away less for us to collect on our one day of feeling good.
We need to clean up every day of the year... Better yet, do not litter at all, so there is nothing to clean up. We need to save power every day. Do we really need a large screen plasma tv? Are we -- if we support Earth Hour at all -- are we just being hypocritical?
Football management misses the point
Could we possibly be more hypocritical than the AFL? The Dockers first home game of the season runs through Earth Hour. "Plunging thousands of people into darkness would be dangerous, sports chiefs say." (The West, 10 March 2008) So... "event organisers plan to promote awareness about reducing the greatest contributor to greenhouse gas emissions -- fossil fuel-fired energy -- by advertising Earth Hour 2008 on their big screens."Advertising "on their big screens"! Wow, that will really save energy, won't it! Well -- for those who don't recognise sarcasm -- no. It would save more energy to turn off those big screens. But at least the AFL does care? Well, no. Not really.
Why is this big game on at night? I would guess that there are sound commercial reasons: higher attendance, more sponsors, much more money from a direct tv telecast at night.
The game is at night so that the AFL can make more money. If the AFL really cared about saving energy, they could play the game during daylight. But no... that would cost them money.
What a bunch of hypocrites... Just like the rest of us.
Independent Thinking |
---|
Independent analysis of your problems by Agamedes Consulting. Support for your thought: email nick leth at gmail dot com |
1 comment:
Here are some recent articles from the papers etc. you might like to read. You might find you really don't need to worry that much after all.
http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,25197,23411799-7583,00.html
http://www.energytribune.com/articles.cfm?aid=821
http://www.financialpost.com/story.html?id=399189
http://www.dailytech.com/Researcher+Basic+Greenhouse+Equations+Totally+Wrong/article10973c.htm
http://www.canada.com/edmontonjournal/news/story.html?id=1d688937-54b7-48f4-a4be-d6979dada5df&k=65311
http://www.heartland.org/NewYork08/newyork08.cfm
http://www.spiked-online.com/index.php?/site/article/3788/
http://www.abc.net.au/rn/inconversation/stories/2007/1998485.htm#transcript
http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,25197,22105154-7583,00.html
http://gustofhotair.blogspot.com/2007/06/global-warming-communism.html
http://www.junkscience.com/
http://www.melaniephillips.com/diary/?p=1544
Post a Comment